‘The Uprising’ (2026): The True History Behind Paul Greengrass’s Peasants’ Revolt Film

Raymond on August 20, 2026

Ink-wash painting of a medieval peasant army marching toward a walled city under a grey sky

On 11 September 2026, Paul Greengrass releases The Uprising, a film that drags one of the most explosive weeks in English history back into the light. Greengrass built his name on visceral, handheld reconstructions of real events — Bloody Sunday, United 93, Captain Phillips — and now he turns that documentary eye on the summer of 1381, with Andrew Garfield and Jamie Bell heading an ensemble that includes Tom Hollander, Stephen Dillane, Thomasin McKenzie, Jonny Lee Miller and Katherine Waterston. It is a story tailor-made for his style: a leaderless mob becomes an army, a boy king faces down a rebellion, and within a single fortnight England came closer to revolution than at any point before the Civil War. But what actually happened? Here is the true history behind the film.

An England already cracking

The revolt did not come out of nowhere. A generation earlier, in 1348–49, the Black Death had swept through England and killed perhaps a third to a half of its people. The survivors made a grim discovery: with so few hands left to work the land, labour was suddenly worth far more. Peasants could demand higher wages, or simply walk off a harsh manor and be hired somewhere better. For the first time in living memory, the men at the bottom had leverage.

The ruling class moved to crush it. The Statute of Labourers, passed in 1351, tried to freeze wages at pre-plague levels and make it a crime for a worker to seek better pay or for a lord to offer it. It was, in effect, a law against the laws of supply and demand — and it was bitterly resented for thirty years. Beneath it simmered the older grievance of villeinage itself: the unfree serf who owed labour and dues to his lord and could not leave without permission. By 1381 a great many English commoners felt they were being forced back into a servitude the plague should have broken.

The tax that lit the fuse

The spark was money. England’s war with France was going badly and the treasury was empty, so Parliament reached for a blunt instrument: the poll tax. Unlike taxes on property, a poll — or head — tax fell on every person alike. The third and most hated of these, granted in 1380 and collected in 1381, demanded a flat shilling from everyone over the age of fifteen. For a wealthy merchant it was pocket change; for a labouring family with several grown children under one roof, it was ruinous.

Predictably, people dodged it. Whole villages vanished from the tax rolls, and in the spring of 1381 the government sent commissioners out to hunt down the missing shillings. That was the match. In Essex, at Brentwood at the end of May, a tax investigator named John Bampton was driven off by furious villagers. Within days the revolt had leapt the Thames into Kent, and what began as scattered resistance to a tax collector became a movement with leaders, demands, and a destination: London.

John Ball and the dream of equality

If the poll tax gave the rising its anger, a wandering priest gave it a soul. John Ball had been preaching radical sermons for years — that lords and serfs were an offence against God, that all men descended from Adam and Eve and none was born to rule another. The Church had jailed him for it, and it was the Kentish rebels who broke open the archbishop’s prison at Maidstone to set him free.

Ball’s most famous line survives through the chronicler Thomas Walsingham, a St Albans monk who loathed everything the rebels stood for and recorded their words to condemn them: “When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?” It was a question the medieval order had no good answer to. In an age that taught peasants to accept their station as divine will, Ball told them that station was a human invention — and that it could be unmade.

Ink-wash of a medieval preacher addressing a crowd of commoners in a misty field at dawn — The renegade priest John Ball preached that all men were created equal — ‘When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?’

The rebels take London

Under the leadership of Wat Tyler, a man from Kent about whom almost nothing is known before June 1381, the rebels moved fast. They seized Rochester Castle, sacked the archbishop’s palace at Canterbury, and swept toward the capital gathering numbers as they went. On 13 June they reached London, and the poor of the city threw open the gates.

What followed was not mindless looting — and the distinction mattered to the rebels themselves. They marched on the Savoy, the fabulously rich riverside palace of John of Gaunt, the king’s uncle and the most hated magnate in England, and burned it to the ground. Yet according to the eyewitness Anonimalle Chronicle, they executed one of their own for trying to pocket a piece of silver, insisting they were “zealots for truth and justice, not thieves.” They opened prisons, burned legal records, and hunted down lawyers and Flemish merchants, but they claimed to be acting in the king’s name against his corrupt advisers. Their enemy, they insisted, was not fourteen-year-old Richard II — it was the men around him.

Mile End, the Tower, and a beheaded archbishop

On 14 June the young king rode out to meet the rebels at Mile End, and there he made astonishing promises: the abolition of serfdom, cheap land at fourpence an acre, an end to forced labour, and pardons for all. Charters were drawn up on the spot and clerks set to work copying them.

But while the king parleyed, other rebels stormed the Tower of London, where the men they blamed for England’s misery had taken shelter. They dragged out Simon Sudbury — Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor, the official face of the poll tax — and Robert Hales, the Treasurer, and beheaded them on Tower Hill. Sudbury’s head was paraded through the streets and mounted on London Bridge. The revolt had now killed the two highest officers of the realm. There could be no quiet return to normal after that.

Ink-wash of a burning medieval riverside palace at night reflected in a dark river — The rebels burned John of Gaunt’s Savoy Palace to the ground — but took nothing, executing any man caught looting.

Smithfield: the day Wat Tyler died

The climax came on 15 June at Smithfield, just outside the city walls. Richard II met Tyler again, and this time the rebel leader’s demands went further still — the end of all lordship below the king, the seizure of Church wealth, equality before the law. Then the meeting broke into violence. Accounts differ, but in the confrontation that followed, the Lord Mayor of London, William Walworth, struck Tyler down, and others finished him. The rebel leader was killed in front of his own army.

For a heartbeat, England hung in the balance. A field full of armed men had just watched their commander cut down. Then the teenage king did the boldest thing of his life: he spurred his horse forward, alone, toward the crowd and called out that he would be their leader now — “I am your captain, follow me.” Whether from awe, confusion, or the promises still ringing in their ears, the rebels followed him away from the city, and the moment of danger passed. It is the scene the whole story bends toward, and the reason Greengrass’s cameras will surely linger there.

The broken promises — and the real legacy

The charters were worthless. With the rebels dispersed and royal forces regrouping, Richard revoked every concession. To a later delegation of Essex men who came to hold him to his word, he is said to have answered coldly: “Villeins ye are, and villeins ye shall remain.” The reprisals were swift and bloody. John Ball was hanged, drawn and quartered at St Albans in July; Jack Straw, another of the leaders, was executed; and by some accounts around 1,500 rebels were killed in the crackdown that followed.

So did the Peasants’ Revolt fail? In the short term, utterly. Yet the government never dared levy that hated poll tax again for centuries, and over the following decades serfdom quietly withered as lords found it easier to rent land than to hold men in bondage. More than the concessions, it was the memory that endured — the astonishing fact that England’s poorest had marched on its capital, executed its chancellor, and made a king listen, if only for a fortnight. Froissart, Walsingham and the anonymous chronicler of York recorded it to warn the powerful; six centuries later, Greengrass reaches for the same story to remind us how thin the line has always been between the ruled and the ruling. The Uprising is fiction dressed in the costume of 1381 — but the fury it dramatises, and the men and women who carried it to the gates of London, were entirely real.

Ink-wash of a young crowned king on horseback facing a large crowd of armed peasants — At Smithfield the 14-year-old Richard II rode out to a rebel army that had just watched their leader cut down — and spoke to them alone.

Sources & further reading: